NEAR Protocol Governance: NDC & Community Control
Learn how NEAR Protocol governance works through the NEAR Digital Collective, validators, and DAOs. Understand token holder participation and protocol...
NEAR Protocol governance is the complete system of rules and processes through which decisions about the NEAR blockchain are proposed and ratified, spanning both on-chain mechanisms and off-chain deliberation. It covers decisions ranging from protocol upgrades and fee structures to community fund allocation. For token holders and community members, understanding governance means understanding who shapes the protocol's future and how to participate.
Think of it like a corporate board combined with a shareholder vote: the NEAR Foundation has historically played the board role, setting strategic direction, while token holders and validators act as shareholders with economic stakes and meaningful influence over protocol decisions. That balance has shifted substantially since 2022, with the NEAR Digital Collective transferring increasing authority to elected community bodies. NEAR Protocol governance reflects a core Web3 principle: that the people who use and build on a network should have a meaningful voice in how it evolves.
On this page:
- What Is NEAR Protocol? (Background)
- How Does NEAR Protocol Governance Work?
- What Is the NEAR Digital Collective (NDC)?
- Who Controls NEAR Protocol? The Foundation vs. the Community
- What Are DAOs on NEAR and How Do They Govern?
- How to Participate in NEAR Protocol Governance
- How Does NEAR Governance Compare to Other Blockchains?
- Key Takeaways and What's Next
- Frequently Asked Questions
What Is NEAR Protocol? (Background)
NEAR Protocol is a Layer 1 blockchain network that launched its mainnet in 2020, built for high throughput using its Nightshade sharding architecture, which splits the network into parallel shards to process transactions simultaneously. It runs on a Proof of Stake (PoS) consensus mechanism, where validators are selected based on the amount of cryptocurrency staked rather than computational power. The network supports smart contracts written in Rust and AssemblyScript, making it a developer-accessible environment for building decentralized applications.
NEAR Protocol is the network whose protocol rules, upgrade decisions, treasury allocations, and future direction are all subject to governance. Understanding this distinction matters: NEAR Protocol (the blockchain network) is separate from the NEAR token (the native cryptocurrency used for gas fees and staking), the NEAR Foundation (the Swiss-based nonprofit steward), and Pagoda (the core protocol development company). All four entities interact within the governance ecosystem, but they hold different roles and authorities.
Since its mainnet launch, NEAR has been on a progressive governance evolution journey, beginning with Foundation-led stewardship and moving toward community-controlled structures through the NEAR Digital Collective.
How Does NEAR Protocol Governance Work?
NEAR Protocol governance operates across four interlocking layers: the on-chain versus off-chain distinction that defines where decisions are made, the NEAR token's role in governance influence, the validator election process that determines who adopts protocol changes, and the NEAR Enhancement Proposal system that formalizes how protocol changes are written and reviewed.
On-Chain vs. Off-Chain: NEAR's Hybrid Model
On-chain governance refers to decisions that are encoded and executed directly on the blockchain through smart contracts, making them tamper-proof and automatically enforceable. Off-chain governance refers to decisions made through social processes such as community forums, working group calls, and informal developer consensus, which are then implemented by human actors. NEAR uses both, and the table below maps which governance decisions fall into each category.
| On-Chain Governance Decisions | Off-Chain Governance Decisions |
|---|---|
| Validator elections via staking and delegation | NEP drafting and community discussion |
| DAO treasury votes via Sputnik DAO | Working Group deliberations and calls |
| NDC House elections | Foundation grant decisions |
| Community Treasury fund disbursements | Protocol direction and ecosystem strategy |
NEAR is progressively moving more governance decisions on-chain through the NDC's governance infrastructure, with the goal of reducing reliance on off-chain social consensus for decisions that smart contracts can encode and enforce directly.
The NEAR Token's Role in Governance
NEAR tokens provide governance influence, though not through a simple 1-token-1-vote mechanism at the protocol level. The connection between token holding and governance works through three distinct pathways.
Staking and delegation: token holders stake NEAR tokens to support validators who process transactions and adopt protocol upgrades. Validators with more staked NEAR have more weight in the validator set, and the validator set collectively determines whether approved protocol changes take effect. DAO participation: within DAOs on NEAR, token holdings can determine voting weight, though each DAO configures its own rules. NDC elections: the NEAR Digital Collective uses account-based participation for its House elections rather than a purely token-weighted model, meaning governance participation is not exclusively reserved for large token holders.
The dual role of NEAR tokens matters here. As a utility token, $NEAR pays gas fees and covers on-chain storage. As a governance instrument, staked $NEAR determines validator influence and earns staking rewards proportional to the amount staked (current reward rates vary based on network parameters; check the NEAR validator documentation for current figures). Understanding both functions is relevant when evaluating how governance influence actually works in practice. For a broader introduction to how crypto staking works, see our staking guide.
How Validators Are Elected (and Why It Matters for Governance)
Validators on NEAR Protocol are elected based on the amount of NEAR tokens staked to them, either directly by the validator operator or delegated by token holders. The nodes with the most staked NEAR earn seats in the active validator set, with the threshold adjusting dynamically based on total network stake. See the NEAR validator documentation for current threshold mechanics.
This election mechanism connects directly to governance because validators must adopt approved protocol upgrades for those changes to take effect across the network. A protocol change can pass the entire social and proposal process, but it cannot go live on NEAR until a sufficient majority of validators implements it. This makes the validator set a de facto governance body for technical decisions, not just a network security mechanism. NEAR's Nightshade sharding architecture means upgrade adoption must coordinate across multiple shards simultaneously, which adds architectural complexity to how protocol changes propagate.
NEAR Enhancement Proposals (NEPs): How Protocol Changes Are Proposed
A NEAR Enhancement Proposal (NEP) is a formal written document proposing a change to the NEAR Protocol, covering protocol upgrades, new technical standards, and changes to network parameters. Think of a NEP like a bill in a legislature: it starts as an idea, moves through public debate and technical review, and only becomes binding when validators implement the approved change.
NEPs are NEAR's equivalent of Ethereum's EIPs (Ethereum Improvement Proposals). The NEP lifecycle follows these steps:
- Post the idea and gather initial feedback on the NEAR governance forum
- Draft a formal NEP document and submit it to the NEAR Enhancement Proposals GitHub repository
- Community members and technical reviewers discuss and refine the proposal
- NEP editors review the proposal for completeness and technical soundness
- Validators implement approved changes when the NEP reaches final status
Note that NEP token standards (such as NEP-141 for fungible tokens and NEP-171 for NFTs) are a subset of NEPs. Those standards govern how applications on NEAR are built; governance NEPs concern the protocol itself. When a treasury-related governance proposal passes, disbursements execute automatically through smart contracts. Protocol upgrades require the additional step of validator adoption before they take effect.
What Is the NEAR Digital Collective (NDC)?
The NEAR Digital Collective (NDC) is a community-led governance initiative launched in 2022–2023 to build on-chain governance infrastructure for NEAR Protocol and progressively transfer governance authority from the NEAR Foundation to the broader community. The NDC was created to answer the question many NEAR token holders ask: who actually controls this protocol, and how can the community gain a meaningful voice in its direction?
The NDC emerged from a recognition that Foundation-led governance, while appropriate for a network's early development, creates tension with long-term decentralization goals. Rather than having the Foundation make decisions on behalf of the community, the NDC was designed to create elected community bodies with real authority over protocol governance and ecosystem funding.
The NDC's governance framework is anchored by a NEAR Constitution, a governance document that formalizes community rights, participation rules, and the responsibilities of elected bodies. The Constitution provides the legal and procedural foundation that elected Houses operate within, distinguishing the NDC from informal governance arrangements that rely on social trust rather than codified rules.
Think of the NDC Houses like the branches of a legislature: each holds different authority, and the separation of roles creates a checks-and-balances system within NEAR governance.
The Three NDC Houses
House Name Primary Role Key Responsibility Transparency Commission Oversight and Accountability Audits community fund use, investigates misconduct, ensures NDC processes remain open House of Merit Technical and Ecosystem Expertise Reviews and endorses protocol and ecosystem decisions requiring technical judgment Community Treasury Ecosystem Funding Control Allocates NEAR tokens for grants, community initiatives, and ecosystem development
The Transparency Commission is an elected body responsible for oversight and accountability within NEAR governance, auditing the use of community funds and investigating misconduct. The House of Merit brings technical and ecosystem expertise to governance decisions, reviewing proposals that require domain knowledge. The Community Treasury controls a pool of NEAR tokens allocated for ecosystem development and grants, governed by elected community representatives rather than the NEAR Foundation. The Community Treasury is the most concrete expression of community-controlled resource allocation on NEAR.
Each NDC House operates as or through a DAO on NEAR, meaning the governance rules for each House are encoded in smart contracts rather than enforced through informal agreements. NDC elections are open to NEAR community members. Visit the NEAR Digital Collective official site for current election cycle information and participation requirements. For context on how other blockchain ecosystems structure community governance bodies, see our guide to how Polkadot's parachain ecosystem works.
Who Controls NEAR Protocol? The Foundation vs. the Community
Control of NEAR Protocol has shifted significantly since the network launched in 2020. The honest answer involves two distinct periods: a Foundation-led era from 2020 to 2022, and a transitional community governance era from 2022 onward through the NEAR Digital Collective. Understanding this shift is central to evaluating NEAR's decentralization trajectory.
The NEAR Foundation's Role: Historical and Current
The NEAR Foundation is a Swiss-based nonprofit organization established to steward the development and ecosystem growth of NEAR Protocol. Visit the NEAR Foundation website for its current governance documentation.
In NEAR's early years (2020–2022), the Foundation served as the primary governance authority, directing protocol development, allocating ecosystem grants, and setting strategic direction for the network. This structure was common for early-stage blockchain networks: a nonprofit entity with clear legal standing and technical expertise provided the coordination necessary to build and grow a new protocol.
The Foundation is distinct from Pagoda (formerly NEAR Inc), which is the core protocol engineering company responsible for building the reference implementation of NEAR Protocol. The Foundation handles governance and ecosystem support; Pagoda handles the technical development work. Both influence NEAR's trajectory but through different mechanisms and with different mandates.
Since 2022, the Foundation has been actively transitioning governance authority to the NDC and community. This transition includes ceding control of ecosystem grant funding to the Community Treasury, supporting the NDC's governance infrastructure development, and reducing its direct role in day-to-day protocol governance decisions.
Is NEAR Protocol Truly Decentralized?
NEAR Protocol is progressively decentralizing, with meaningful community governance structures now in place through the NDC. Governance authority, however, has not been fully transferred from the Foundation to the community. The picture looks different depending on the time period examined.
Before the NDC (2020–2022), NEAR governance was primarily Foundation-led. The Foundation made decisions about protocol direction, ecosystem funding, and governance priorities with limited formal community input mechanisms. After the NDC launched (2022–present), the landscape changed substantially. Elected community Houses now control ecosystem grant funding through the Community Treasury. NDC House elections give community members direct representation in governance. The NEAR Constitution provides a formal framework for community rights. The Foundation retains influence through its continued role in protocol development coordination and ecosystem support, but that role is narrowing as NDC governance structures mature.
Neither "NEAR is fully decentralized" nor "NEAR is Foundation-controlled" accurately characterizes the current state. NEAR is progressively decentralizing, with the NDC representing a significant and concrete step toward community ownership. The governance structures continue to evolve, and the NDC's authority is expected to grow as the initiative matures. For the most current state of NDC governance, visit neardigitalcollective.com.
What Are DAOs on NEAR and How Do They Govern?
DAOs are one of the primary operating structures through which NEAR governance gets done at the community level. Working Groups, funding committees, ecosystem grant bodies, and the NDC Houses themselves are all organized as or through DAOs on NEAR.
What Is a DAO on NEAR?
A DAO (Decentralized Autonomous Organization) on NEAR is a community organization whose governance rules are encoded in smart contracts, enabling transparent group decision-making without a central authority. Smart contracts on NEAR are self-executing programs deployed on the blockchain that automatically enforce governance rules, manage treasuries, and record votes without requiring human intermediaries.
On NEAR, DAOs range from small working groups managing a few thousand dollars in grants to large governance bodies like the NDC Houses managing ecosystem-scale funding. Think of them like departmental committees: each DAO handles a specific governance domain within the broader NEAR governance structure, with rules encoded in its smart contracts rather than in a corporate charter.
NEAR's governance is layered: the protocol-level governance (NDC Houses and validators) sits above project-level governance (individual DeFi protocol DAOs and ecosystem project DAOs). DeFi protocols built on NEAR, such as lending platforms and decentralized exchanges, often run their own governance tokens and DAOs independently of protocol governance. Some major projects on NEAR, like Aurora (an Ethereum-compatible environment built on NEAR), operate entirely independent governance systems. This layered structure means NEAR's governance ecosystem is modular rather than monolithic.
Sputnik DAO: NEAR's Governance Framework
Sputnik DAO is NEAR's smart contract DAO factory framework, the underlying infrastructure that allows anyone to deploy a customizable DAO on NEAR with configurable membership rules, voting thresholds, and treasury management. AstroDAO (astrodao.com) is the primary web interface that makes Sputnik DAOs accessible without requiring smart contract knowledge. NDC Working Groups, community funds, and ecosystem projects all run through Sputnik DAOs.
The distinction matters: Sputnik DAO is the smart contract layer; AstroDAO is the user interface layer. When governance documentation refers to "joining a DAO" or "voting on a proposal," the practical pathway is through AstroDAO. The participation guide below walks through how to vote on DAO proposals step by step.
How to Participate in NEAR Protocol Governance
Participating in NEAR Protocol governance is open to any NEAR token holder, and there are four distinct pathways depending on your level of involvement and your goals. You can stake or delegate tokens, vote on DAO proposals, submit or comment on NEAR Enhancement Proposals, or participate in NDC elections. These pathways are not mutually exclusive: you can engage with any combination of them simultaneously.
Participation pathways at a glance:
- Stake or delegate NEAR tokens via MyNearWallet
- Vote on DAO governance proposals via AstroDAO
- Submit or comment on NEPs via the governance forum and GitHub
- Vote in NDC House elections via neardigitalcollective.com
Step 1: Set Up a NEAR Wallet (MyNearWallet)
All governance participation pathways on NEAR require a NEAR account. The recommended tool is MyNearWallet (mynearwallet.com), the community-maintained wallet that replaced the now-sunset original NEAR Wallet.
- Visit mynearwallet.com and create a new NEAR account
- Secure your seed phrase and store it offline
- Fund your account with NEAR tokens via an exchange transfer
Interface details may vary as the platform evolves; refer to MyNearWallet's official documentation for the most current setup steps. For general guidance on crypto wallet staking questions, see our staking FAQ.
Step 2: Stake or Delegate NEAR Tokens
Delegating NEAR tokens to a validator is the most accessible governance participation pathway for most token holders. Think of it as assigning a proxy vote to a representative you trust: you are not transferring ownership of your tokens, but you are directing your governance influence to a validator whose operation and upgrade decisions you support. Delegation also earns staking rewards proportional to your staked amount, with rates varying based on network parameters.
Note that this guide covers validation staking and delegation, not storage staking (which locks NEAR to pay for on-chain storage and serves a separate technical function).
- Open MyNearWallet and connect your NEAR account
- Navigate to the Staking section in the main menu
- Browse the list of active validators and evaluate them based on uptime, fee rates, and community reputation
- Enter the amount of NEAR tokens you want to delegate
- Confirm the delegation transaction
Choosing which validator to delegate to is an implicit governance act. Validators with more staked NEAR have more influence over whether protocol upgrades are adopted, so your delegation choice shapes the governance weight of that validator. Do not delegate based solely on reward rates; consider the validator's governance participation and technical reliability. For current validator information, refer to the NEAR validator documentation.
Step 3: Vote on DAO Proposals via AstroDAO
To vote on governance proposals within NEAR's DAO ecosystem, you use AstroDAO, the web interface for Sputnik DAOs where NDC-affiliated working groups, community funds, and ecosystem initiatives post proposals for member votes.
- Visit astrodao.com
- Connect your NEAR wallet using the wallet connection prompt
- Browse the DAO directory and find a governance DAO relevant to your interests (NDC-affiliated DAOs, community grant DAOs, or ecosystem project DAOs)
- Review open proposals, reading the full proposal text before voting
- Cast your vote (approve, reject, or abstain) according to the DAO's voting rules
DAO voting eligibility and vote weight vary by DAO configuration. Some DAOs are token-weighted, meaning more NEAR tokens in your account gives you more voting power. Others are membership-based, meaning all members have equal votes regardless of token holdings. NDC Houses operate as DAOs, so NDC-related governance votes also occur through on-chain mechanisms accessible via AstroDAO.
Step 4: Participate in the NEP Process or NDC Elections
The two most direct pathways for shaping NEAR Protocol at the governance level are submitting or commenting on NEAR Enhancement Proposals (NEPs) and participating in NDC House elections. NEPs target protocol-level technical changes; NDC elections determine who holds governance authority over community funds and ecosystem decisions.
For NEP participation:
- Post your idea on the NEAR governance forum to gather initial community feedback
- Draft a formal NEP document following the template in the NEAR Enhancement Proposals GitHub repository
- Submit your NEP as a pull request to the NEPs repository
- Engage with community reviewers and technical editors during the review process
For NDC election participation:
- Visit neardigitalcollective.com to review current election cycle announcements
- Review candidate profiles for each of the three Houses (Transparency Commission, House of Merit, Community Treasury)
- Vote in active House elections through the on-chain voting mechanism
Developers seeking ecosystem funding can access grant programs governed by the NDC Community Treasury, and can also explore NEAR Horizon (NEAR's accelerator program for early-stage ecosystem founders) as a supplementary resource.
How Does NEAR Governance Compare to Other Blockchains?
NEAR Protocol governance differs from Ethereum governance in one key structural way: NEAR is building formalized on-chain governance through the NDC, with elected Houses and an on-chain Community Treasury, while Ethereum relies on off-chain social consensus among core developers with no formal on-chain voting mechanism for protocol changes. Polkadot's OpenGov system represents a more mature on-chain governance model than either, with multi-track voting and a Technical Fellowship managing different proposal types at different approval thresholds.
Each model reflects different design trade-offs between decentralization speed, technical coordination efficiency, and community accessibility. No single model is objectively superior.
| Feature | NEAR Protocol | Ethereum | Polkadot |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Decision Body | NDC elected Houses + validators + DAOs | Core developers + informal community consensus | OpenGov Technical Fellowship + DOT token holders |
| On-Chain Voting Mechanism | NDC House elections, DAO treasury votes, validator elections | None for protocol changes (off-chain only) | Multi-track on-chain voting via Polkadot OpenGov |
| Token Role in Governance | Staking/delegation influences validator weight; DAO votes can be token-weighted; NDC elections are account-based | No direct protocol governance role for ETH holders | DOT tokens used for direct on-chain voting on proposals |
| Proposal Process | NEPs via GitHub and governance forum, adopted by validators | Ethereum Improvement Proposals (EIPs) via GitHub and All Core Devs calls | Multi-track referenda submitted on-chain with DOT deposits |
| Decentralization Model | Progressively decentralizing via NDC; Foundation transitioning authority to community | Off-chain social consensus; no formal governance body | On-chain governance with elected fellowship; more formalized than Ethereum |
Ethereum's governance relies on off-chain coordination: protocol changes go through the EIP process on GitHub, are debated in All Core Developers calls, and are adopted through informal rough consensus among node operators and developers. There is no formal on-chain voting for Ethereum protocol changes, which means governance influence correlates with social standing in the developer community rather than token holdings.
Polkadot's OpenGov (Gov2) model features multi-track on-chain voting with different approval thresholds per proposal type, and the Technical Fellowship provides a structured body of expert reviewers. NEAR's NDC model sits between these two approaches: more formalized than Ethereum's social consensus, but still maturing relative to Polkadot's established on-chain infrastructure. NEAR's use of elected Houses is representative rather than purely token-weighted, which distinguishes it from Polkadot's DOT-weighted voting model. For a broader introduction to how Polkadot is structured as a blockchain, see our Polkadot explainer.
NEAR Protocol Governance: Key Takeaways and What's Next
NEAR Protocol governance has moved from Foundation-led authority in its early years to a structured community governance framework through the NEAR Digital Collective, with elected Houses, an on-chain Community Treasury, and an evolving NEAR Constitution formalizing community rights. The NDC represents an ongoing project, not a completed transformation: governance structures continue to develop as more authority shifts from the Foundation to community-elected bodies.
NEAR's governance model reflects the broader Web3 shift toward community-owned, community-governed networks, and the NDC's architecture gives token holders more concrete pathways to governance influence than existed in the protocol's first two years. The governance forum, NDC elections, and validator delegation all represent real mechanisms for community influence, not symbolic participation.
To follow active governance proposals and NDC election announcements, visit the NEAR governance forum or explore the NEAR Digital Collective official site.
Disclaimer: This article is intended for informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute financial advice, investment advice, or a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any cryptocurrency, including NEAR tokens. Cryptocurrency investments carry significant risk, including the risk of total loss. Always conduct your own research and consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions.
Frequently Asked Questions: NEAR Protocol Governance
Who Controls NEAR Protocol?
No single entity controls NEAR Protocol outright. The NEAR Foundation historically held primary governance authority but is actively transitioning that authority to the NEAR Digital Collective (NDC) and the broader community. Today, governance authority is distributed across the NDC's three elected Houses, the validator set (which must adopt protocol upgrades), and community DAOs. The Foundation retains influence but its governance role is narrowing as NDC structures mature.
What Is the NEAR Digital Collective?
The NEAR Digital Collective (NDC) is a community-led governance initiative launched in 2022–2023 that built on-chain governance infrastructure for NEAR Protocol. It consists of three elected Houses: the Transparency Commission (oversight), the House of Merit (technical expertise), and the Community Treasury (ecosystem funding). The NDC transfers governance authority from the NEAR Foundation to community-elected representatives, operating under a NEAR Constitution that formalizes governance rights and rules.
How Does Staking Work on NEAR Protocol?
Staking on NEAR works by delegating NEAR tokens to a validator node, contributing to that validator's staked weight and earning staking rewards proportional to your delegated amount. Open MyNearWallet (mynearwallet.com), navigate to Staking, select a validator, enter your delegation amount, and confirm the transaction. You retain ownership of your tokens; delegation is not a transfer. Reward rates vary based on network parameters, so verify current figures at the NEAR validator documentation page.
What Is a DAO on NEAR?
A DAO (Decentralized Autonomous Organization) on NEAR is a community organization governed by smart contracts rather than a central authority, enabling transparent group decision-making with rules that execute automatically on-chain. On NEAR, DAOs are deployed using the Sputnik DAO framework and range from small working groups to large governance bodies like the NDC Houses. DAOs handle ecosystem grants, community coordination, and governance votes. The primary interface for interacting with NEAR DAOs is AstroDAO (astrodao.com).
How Are Validators Chosen on NEAR Protocol?
Validators on NEAR Protocol are elected based on the amount of NEAR tokens staked to them, either self-staked by the validator operator or delegated by token holders. The validators with the most staked NEAR earn seats in the active validator set, with the minimum threshold adjusting dynamically based on total network stake. Validators hold governance significance because they must adopt protocol upgrades for changes to take effect across NEAR's Nightshade-sharded network. Token holders who delegate to validators influence which validators hold seats.
What Is the NEAR Foundation's Role in Governance?
The NEAR Foundation is a Swiss-based nonprofit that stewards NEAR Protocol's development and ecosystem growth. In NEAR's early years (2020–2022), the Foundation led governance and protocol direction. Since 2022, it has been actively transitioning governance authority to the NDC and community-elected bodies, ceding ecosystem grant control to the Community Treasury while reducing its direct decision-making role. The Foundation is separate from Pagoda, the core protocol engineering company, which handles technical development rather than governance.
How Do I Vote on NEAR Governance Proposals?
To vote on NEAR governance proposals, visit AstroDAO (astrodao.com) and connect your NEAR wallet. Browse the DAO directory to find governance-relevant DAOs, such as NDC-affiliated working groups or community grant DAOs. Review open proposals and cast your vote according to each DAO's voting rules. Eligibility varies by DAO: some require token holdings above a threshold, others accept all wallet-connected members. For protocol-level NEPs, participation happens through the NEAR governance forum and GitHub rather than AstroDAO.
What Is the Difference Between On-Chain and Off-Chain Governance?
On-chain governance refers to decisions encoded and executed directly on the blockchain via smart contracts, making them transparent and automatically enforceable without relying on human intermediaries. Off-chain governance refers to decisions made through social processes like community forums, developer calls, and informal consensus, then implemented by human actors. NEAR uses both: validator elections, DAO treasury votes, and NDC elections happen on-chain, while NEP drafting, working group deliberations, and Foundation grant decisions happen off-chain. NEAR is progressively moving more decisions on-chain.
How Does NEAR Governance Compare to Ethereum?
NEAR Protocol governance differs from Ethereum governance primarily in its use of on-chain structures: NEAR's NDC provides elected Houses, an on-chain Community Treasury, and formal voting mechanisms, while Ethereum relies entirely on off-chain social consensus among core developers with no formal on-chain voting for protocol changes. Ethereum's EIP process is driven by developer community standing rather than elected representation or token-weighted votes. NEAR gives token holders more structured governance pathways than Ethereum currently provides at the protocol level.
What Is a NEAR Enhancement Proposal (NEP)?
A NEAR Enhancement Proposal (NEP) is a formal written document proposing a change to the NEAR Protocol, covering protocol upgrades, new technical standards, and network parameter changes. NEPs are NEAR's equivalent of Ethereum's EIPs. The process runs from idea (posted to the NEAR governance forum) through draft submission to GitHub, community review, technical editor review, and finally validator adoption. NEP token standards like NEP-141 and NEP-171 are a subset of NEPs governing application-layer standards, separate from protocol governance NEPs.